- From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth@liverpool.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 09:55:46 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Matthew Dovey <matthew.dovey@las.ox.ac.uk>
- cc: Mike Taylor <mike@tecc.co.uk>, <www-zig@w3.org>
> I don't think you can "base" on attribute on another in the new > attribute architecture - however, an attribute set can inherit an > attribute from another set and use additional qualifiers (functional and > semantic) on that attribute. > I think Rob is thinking more of RDF et al. where you can indicate that > an element is a derivative (in some way) of another... No no, just a bad way of expressing it. By 'based off' I meant 'to always be used in conjunction with' For example BIB2, apart from a few searches where they've defined new access points, is used in conjunction with UTIL and XD in just the way it should be, as per the architecture. Rob > > > > What do you mean by "attributes based off of UTIL-1", Rob? > > > > > > I mean that it uses UTIL, or XD in the way specificied in the > > > architecture. :) -- ,'/:. Rob Sanderson (azaroth@liverpool.ac.uk) ,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/ ,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142 ,'---/::::::::::. Twin Cathedrals: telnet: liverpool.o-r-g.org 7777 ____/:::::::::::::. WWW: http://liverpool.o-r-g.org:8000/ I L L U M I N A T I
Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2002 04:59:24 UTC