- From: Matthew Dovey <matthew.dovey@las.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 09:06:05 -0000
- To: "Mike Taylor" <mike@tecc.co.uk>, <azaroth@liverpool.ac.uk>
- Cc: <www-zig@w3.org>
I don't think you can "base" on attribute on another in the new attribute architecture - however, an attribute set can inherit an attribute from another set and use additional qualifiers (functional and semantic) on that attribute. I think Rob is thinking more of RDF et al. where you can indicate that an element is a derivative (in some way) of another... Matthew > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Taylor [mailto:mike@tecc.co.uk] > Sent: 25 February 2002 16:27 > To: azaroth@liverpool.ac.uk > Cc: www-zig@w3.org > Subject: Re: Z39.50 on the web (and in print) > > > > Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 15:59:08 +0000 (GMT) > > From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth@liverpool.ac.uk> > > > > > > I want to be able say that my server supports an attribute set > > > > with X OID with the following attributes based off of > UTIL-1 and > > > > XD-1 ... > > > > > > What do you mean by "attributes based off of UTIL-1", Rob? > > > > I mean that it uses UTIL, or XD in the way specificied in the > > architecture. :) > > > > <map> > > <access attributeset="UTIL-1">1</access> > > <semantic attributeset="my oid here">12</semantic> > > </map> > > > > or however you want to express it. > > Sorry if I'm being dim here, but I'm still not sure exactly > sure what you're trying to express here. Let me try again. > What does it mean for one attribute set to be "based off" another? > > _/|_ _______________________________________________________________ > /o ) \/ Mike Taylor <mike@miketaylor.org.uk> www.miketaylor.org.uk )_v__/\ "Thankfully, Ronald Reagan wasn't the embodiment of supreme evil" -- Daniel Eliyahu.
Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2002 04:06:08 UTC