- From: Mark Needleman - DRA <mneedlem@dra.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 19:20:02 -0600 (CST)
- To: Matthew Dovey <matthew.dovey@las.ox.ac.uk>
- cc: www-zig@w3.org
Matthew i think we should make it simple and just get an oid assigned mark On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Matthew Dovey wrote: > A few others have expressed the same view - the record format requested > should be XML, and another (unspecificed) method should be used to request a > specific DTD (or XSD). > > Could eSpec be used for this? Or do we need to consider something new here? > > Matthew > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mark Needleman - DRA" <mneedlem@dra.com> > To: "Matthew Dovey" <matthew.dovey@las.ox.ac.uk> > Cc: <www-zig@w3.org>; <brian@bic.org.uk> > Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 12:56 PM > Subject: RE: Next ZIG - new record type > > > > Matthew > > > > yes - theoretically since it has a dtd you can recognize it when you get > > it but it would be nice to be able to ask for the ONIX formatted record in > > the request > > > > mark > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2001 20:20:47 UTC