- From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth@liverpool.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 09:39:39 +0100 (BST)
- To: ZIG <www-zig@w3.org>
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Alan Kent wrote: > On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 05:23:30PM +0100, Robert Sanderson wrote: > > Get your programmers who are experienced in Z to write an API for your non > > Z programmers to use. If you chose to publish this API such that others > > can use it, more power to you. /This/ would be a productive way forward, > > rather than discarding bits which are complex but have already been > > implemented by others. > > To me, this is exactly what ZNG is - a standardised web services > interface to Z39.50. Our product is not going to drop the core > Z39.50 protocol. We are going to add an alternative "web services" > interface allowing SOAP clients written in any language to access > our server easily in a way that programmers will understand. Except that there was no mention of retaining the current Z protocol along with ZNG. Either: a) It's an implementers agreement about which names to use in cgi scripts which query real Z databases. or: b) There's no Z behind it, just an everyday database which could be sql, moo or anything in between. Either way, it's useful to people wanting to build a database that can be queried in a standard way, but is not deserving of the description 'next generation of Z39.50'. > I don't see ZNG as a "replacement of Z39.50". I see it as some of > the vendors agreeing to a subset of Z39.50 via a SOAP based API > rather than each vendor developing their own proprietory API. Quite :) This is useful, especially if the underlying code is released to the community as well as the specifications of how to use it. Rob -- ,'/:. Rob Sanderson (azaroth@liverpool.ac.uk) ,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/ ,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142 ,'---/::::::::::. Syrinnia: telnet: syrinnia.o-r-g.org 7777 ____/:::::::::::::. WWW: http://syrinnia.o-r-g.org:8000/ I L L U M I N A T I
Received on Monday, 16 July 2001 04:43:29 UTC