Re: Init is dead?

> No Init is not dead yet. Not for me at least.
> I do not agree with the idea that the Init contains only useless
> information.

I don't think anyone is saying init contains (only) useless information,
or that it will go away.  The argument is that for some, often less robust,
applications, init is not needed; and may be a hinderance.
  So the argument is for such applications/services it would be desireable
for init to be optional.

  To me this strikes me as a, in many ways, minor change:
    - servers that require init just have to do something when they get a
      different PDU before init. Gee - guess we all do something already -)
      crashing is probably unacceptable at the server end, but abrupt
      termination of the connection is certainly something the client 
      might expect.
    - for the protocol this also strikes me as minor, but I admit I have 
      always ignored the state tables...  And I don't mind statements like:
	 if init is obmitted all the things the client/server learn
	 via init are undefined and all behavior is acceptable...

  bob

-- 
Robert K. Waldstein                Email: wald@lucent.com
Bell Laboratories, Room 3D-591     Phone: (908) 582-6171
600 Mountain Avenue
Murray Hill, New Jersey  07974

Received on Monday, 15 January 2001 09:50:55 UTC