- From: Rob Bull <bull@crxnet.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 16:01:34 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Ray Denenberg <rden@loc.gov>
- cc: www-zig@w3.org
Ray, > Working backwards -- yes, it's the correct version. OK - thanks. > > AttributeElement is Imported because it is referenced by AttributeList, which is > Imported. When I wrote the definition I wasn't sure how to treat this case (and > I'm still not sure) so Importing AttributeElement seemed the safe thing to do -- > at worst it's an innocuous, extraneous Import. OK > > Was there a reason to explicitly define AttributesPlusTerm instead of Importing > it? I thought there was, but I can't reconstruct it. It could have been > Imported. Does it matter? Do you want a defect report generated? ... its just that I thought we generally tried to avoid duplication of ASN where possible. We're happy to leave it is as it is - its probably less hassle than going through the defect procedure. Rob
Received on Friday, 20 October 2000 11:07:27 UTC