- From: Rob Bull <bull@crxnet.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 09:35:42 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Kevin Gamiel <kgamiel@islandedge.com>
- cc: www-zig@w3.org
Kevin, > > I agree with every point. My only concern is the *way* in which you > deliver the xml. Do you have a description of how you do it? Does the > client explicitly ask for it? - so far the work has concentrated on the XML itself - it would be delivered on the Init response Other info field, as octet-aligned using an appropriate OID. > > I personally would rather see us finish work like Alan Kent has done on > concatenating PDUs and using otherwise standard mechanisms instead of > special-casing things like init. That means you could implement > explain-lite by sending a standard init request and search request in a > single request. That would give us other benefits we've wanted for some > time, and still give you the explain information you want in a single > request/response pair. we have concentrated on the conventional model of using non-concatonated PDUs - Our requirements are to have the information from the init, but before search, extended services, scan etc. Rob
Received on Thursday, 22 June 2000 04:38:51 UTC