- From: Christian Roth <www-xsl-fo.list@kriro.de>
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 23:55:18 +0200
- To: www-xsl-fo@w3.org
Hello, quick question: What happens if .maximum is less than .optimum? E.g., inline-progression-dimension.minimum="1pt" inline-progression-dimension.optimum="10pt" inline-progression-dimension.maximum="5pt" Is the .optimum value still getting constrained by .minimum and .maximum (resulting in an inline-progression-dimension value of "5pt" in my example), or do other rules take effect? I've skimmed the XSL-FO spec, but could not (yet?) find the place where this is defined. The example above of course yells "who would write that?!". My use case is that I would like to have an image 2in wide if possible, but still being constrained to the available column width at that place, i.e. I'd thought to specify that as inline-progression-dimension.minimum="0pt" inline-progression-dimension.optimum="2in" inline-progression-dimension.maximum="100%" If 100% of the available width is less than 2in, what should happen? As an example, Antennahouse 7.1 sets the image at 2in width, even if 100% of the available width is < 2in, and hence overflows the image into the margin. That came as a surprise to me. Thanks, Christian
Received on Tuesday, 29 June 2021 17:29:11 UTC