- From: Marijan (Mario) Madunic <hajduk@imag.net>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 12:30:32 -0700
- To: "Liam R. E. Quin" <liam@w3.org>, "Howard, Chris" <HowardC@prpa.org>, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Cc: xsl-fo Mailing <www-xsl-fo@w3.org>
If I remember correctly from a youtube vid that a rep of AntennaHouse was speaking about CSS to Print, he did mention the following (at the time of the vid): The process in AntennaHouse when doing CSS to Print was, CSS to FO to PDF. Also does anyone know if CSS is now on level with FO? I'd spend more time on CSS to Print but I believe there are no free applications. Marijan (Mario) Madunic On 6/11/2018 9:51 AM, Liam R. E. Quin wrote: > On Mon, 2018-06-11 at 16:07 +0000, Howard, Chris wrote: >> So, is XSL-FO a going thing these days? > Yes. > >> Or have people moved on to something else that I've never heard of? > The primary alternative is to use CSS directly, but the systems that > support that all seem to have to add a lot of extension properties. > > Although we (W3C) stopped doing work on XSL-FO 2 since there weren't > enough people particpating, XSL-Fo still meets people's needs and is in > use. > > Liam >
Received on Monday, 11 June 2018 19:30:59 UTC