- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:38:14 +0000
- To: Tony Graham <Tony.Graham@menteithconsulting.com>
- Cc: www-xsl-fo@w3.org
On 10 December 2010 15:19, Tony Graham <Tony.Graham@menteithconsulting.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 09 2010 11:29:00 +0000, dave.pawson@gmail.com wrote: > ... >> Another oddity? >> http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/#fo_instream-foreign-object > > Can you change the subject line or start a new thread for a new topic? Yes, will do. > >> The content model of 'any' would suffice. Without the <eg/> >> child it requires special treatment? > > How to you reconcile 'ANY' with "The fo:instream-foreign-object flow > object has a child from a non-XSL namespace." (especially given that the > "Contents" subsections are using XML content model syntax)? Agreed. The xml content model doesn't work very well does it. It would require a definition... as the remainder seem to have. An issue would be the use of the 'string' any vs a keyword any. OK, An exception. regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Friday, 10 December 2010 15:38:46 UTC