- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 16:03:53 +0000
- To: www-xsl-fo@w3.org
Playing around with it, except for one item, I have a first cut syntax tree, each element and all its properties. Re the parameter entities. 6.2 defines them textually, but there is no xml definition of them? That would be a nice addition for automated processing. Either as XML for an inclusion or as xml entities. I commented to Tony, in answer to his 'every property on every element' response. Two uses for a schema. 1. When writing an fo tree I only need what is reasonable/implemented. 2. When decorating such a tree for inheritance I can expand that schema to include any properties I want inherited. My current focus is on the former use. regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Sunday, 5 December 2010 16:04:23 UTC