Re: xsl-fo first anniversary from Dave Pawson on 2002-10-18 (www-xsl-fo@w3.org from October 2002)

From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@nildram.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 17:46:54 +0100
To: (wrong string) Ãric Bischoff <e.bischoff@noos.fr>, <www-xsl-fo@w3.org>
Message-Id: <5.1.1.6.2.20021018174507.028d3420@pop3.nildram.co.uk>

At 11:16 18/10/2002, Ã‰ric Bischoff wrote:

>1 - I am feeling that the specification as http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/ should be 
>split in two : a definition of XSL as the combination of XSLT and XSL-FO, and 
>XSL-FO reference. Currently, I find the confusion between XSL and XSL-FO very 
>puzzling.

+1.
It does need sorting out.
Suggest:
Kill XSL as a rec
XSLT lives.
XPATH lives
Affirm XSL-FO.

Use XSL as the Working group umbrella.

>Linux produces remarkedly less hot air than Windows: under
>Windows, the processor gets hot after just a few minutes.

Ah, but it never stays on long enough to burn out :-)

DaveP.

Received on Friday, 18 October 2002 12:48:20 UTC