- From: Éric Bischoff <e.bischoff@noos.fr>
- Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 12:16:07 +0200
- To: <www-xsl-fo@w3.org>
Hi all, Perharps the biggest success is that people start considering xsl-fo as a valid replacement solution for LaTeX in production environments :-). Completly unrelated : 1 - I am feeling that the specification as http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/ should be split in two : a definition of XSL as the combination of XSLT and XSL-FO, and XSL-FO reference. Currently, I find the confusion between XSL and XSL-FO very puzzling. 2 - A small mistake in the spec: in section 7.20.1, the "clip" property uses the <shape> datatype. The <shape> datatype is not defined in section 5.11 "property datatypes". -- Linux produces remarkedly less hot air than Windows: under Windows, the processor gets hot after just a few minutes.
Received on Friday, 18 October 2002 06:15:03 UTC