- From: Steve Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2001 08:53:16 -0700
- To: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk>
- Cc: www-xsl-fo@w3.org, maxf@w3.org, sca@us.ibm.com
- Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010903084842.0269ff40@mailsj-v1>
At 01:44 AM 9/3/2001 +0100, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>Steve Zilles writes:
> > 2. Description of CR results
> >
> > The CR exit criteria for XSL 1.0 were achieved in August 2001. The
> > XSL Working Group has documented multiple implementations of each
> > feature in the specification.
>
>this statement is explicitly contradicted by the very report it cites:
>
> > The XSL 1.0 implementation report is publicly available at:
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2001/08/28-XSL-PR-IR.html
>
>"All FOs belonging to the 'basic' conformance level have been
> implemented, as well as most 'extended' FOs, except:
>
> 1.color-profile
> 2.bidi-override
> 3.multi-toggle, multi-properties, multi-property-sets
>
> Other mechanisms not reflected in particular FOs and not
> implemented to our knowledge are
>
> 1.baseline alignment properties
> 2.scrolling mechanisms
> 3.aural properties "
>
>and there does not seem to be a table showing implementation of
>properties? is bidi text really implementated? and all the hyphenation
>properties?
The exit criteria were met provided that the functionality had been
implemented. In some cases, particularly for properties that are also in
CSS or SVG, a CSS or SVG implementation was cited. This applies to the
baseline alignment properties, aural properties, color-profile, scrolling
mechanisms and bidi directional text. I believe Antenna House has
implemented bidi-override. And there is an XSL implementation of the
"multi-" properties.
>just curious whether issues are in fact being fudged....
>
>sebastian
Steve
=====================================
Steve Zilles, Adobe Systems Incorporated
345 Park Avenue,San Jose, CA 95110-2704
Office # +1 408 536-4766
Fax # +1 408 537-4042
Received on Monday, 3 September 2001 11:59:09 UTC