- From: Steve Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2001 08:53:16 -0700
- To: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk>
- Cc: www-xsl-fo@w3.org, maxf@w3.org, sca@us.ibm.com
- Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010903084842.0269ff40@mailsj-v1>
At 01:44 AM 9/3/2001 +0100, Sebastian Rahtz wrote: >Steve Zilles writes: > > 2. Description of CR results > > > > The CR exit criteria for XSL 1.0 were achieved in August 2001. The > > XSL Working Group has documented multiple implementations of each > > feature in the specification. > >this statement is explicitly contradicted by the very report it cites: > > > The XSL 1.0 implementation report is publicly available at: > > > > http://www.w3.org/2001/08/28-XSL-PR-IR.html > >"All FOs belonging to the 'basic' conformance level have been > implemented, as well as most 'extended' FOs, except: > > 1.color-profile > 2.bidi-override > 3.multi-toggle, multi-properties, multi-property-sets > > Other mechanisms not reflected in particular FOs and not > implemented to our knowledge are > > 1.baseline alignment properties > 2.scrolling mechanisms > 3.aural properties " > >and there does not seem to be a table showing implementation of >properties? is bidi text really implementated? and all the hyphenation >properties? The exit criteria were met provided that the functionality had been implemented. In some cases, particularly for properties that are also in CSS or SVG, a CSS or SVG implementation was cited. This applies to the baseline alignment properties, aural properties, color-profile, scrolling mechanisms and bidi directional text. I believe Antenna House has implemented bidi-override. And there is an XSL implementation of the "multi-" properties. >just curious whether issues are in fact being fudged.... > >sebastian Steve ===================================== Steve Zilles, Adobe Systems Incorporated 345 Park Avenue,San Jose, CA 95110-2704 Office # +1 408 536-4766 Fax # +1 408 537-4042
Received on Monday, 3 September 2001 11:59:09 UTC