- From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 19:51:35 +0000
- To: davidc@nag.co.uk
- Cc: pgrosso@arbortext.com, www-xsl-fo@w3.org
David Carlisle writes: > defaults to some fixed or null value). But to handle shorthands you have > to do this by hand, picking them up parsing the compound value, and > assigning to the lower level property macros. It is a lot of extra work > for essentially no gain. Ie if I liked the shorthands I could probably > implement them, but since they seem like an unpleasant intrusion into > the language the incentive isn't really there. (Maybe Sebastian will do > it anyway, as you say: user pressure....) PassiveTeX does indeed expand some shorthands now. Primarily driven by the RenderX test files, actually, as I find them a useful benchmark. I really resent having spent the time on it :-} And I still think that 'font="10pt Helvetica bold"' is horrible in anyone's book. Thats not a shorthand, its plain laziness! `border-style=solid' I find more comprehensible. Sebastian
Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2001 18:09:02 UTC