- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 20:52:48 GMT
- To: bodo.t@web.de
- CC: www-xsl-fo@w3.org
> well , i'm not using passivetex, the point is that i'm writing my own > fo-processor... > bodo in that case I think the answer to your original question is no, but as in xmltex you can squeeze in extra functionality using processing instructions or elements in a different namespace, so long as you don't let anyone in the working group know your're doing it:-) David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
Received on Thursday, 13 December 2001 15:53:07 UTC