- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:30:35 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20392 Bug ID: 20392 Summary: Specify namespace of the precisionDecimal datatype Classification: Unclassified Product: XML Schema Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Windows 3.1 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2 Assignee: David_E3@VERIFONE.com Reporter: cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com QA Contact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org CC: cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com Depends on: 13422 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #13422 +++ The current draft of the precisionDecimal note does not say what namespace the datatype is in (at least not that anyone in the meeting could see). This should be required as part of the documentation for implementation-defined datatypes, so perhaps this will automatically be taken care of as part of the resolution of bug 13421. But if that turns out not to be the case, then that's a gap in the requirements for implementation-defined datatypes. (The rules for implementation-defined types say a simple type definition is required; that seems to entail specifying a namespace, but it might be helpful to be more explicit.) (There is also some question about how to make a conforming simple type definition for a primitive, given that the base type has to be xs:anySimpleType or xs:anyAtomicType, which aren't usually legal. Further investigation needed.) [14 Dec 2012: clone this bug to record the proposed change to Datatypes in Appendix H, item 3.c] -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 14 December 2012 16:30:38 UTC