- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:29:02 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13422 --- Comment #1 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> --- Discussing this on the phone with Dave Peterson today, it seemed to me that the right thing to do, both with respect to the namespace issue and with respect to the question in the final parenthetical remark, is to include in the definition of any implementation-defined primitive a tableau analogous to those in section 4.1.6 (http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/#builtin-stds) of the Datatypes spec. Such a tableau will (among other things) specify explicitly the target namespace and base type of the new primitive. Dave Peterson points out that it would not be a bad idea to say something like this explicitly in the Datatypes spec. In appendix H, change item 3.c from c. The values of the ·fundamental facets·. to c. The values of the ·fundamental facets· and of all applicable component properties. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 14 December 2012 16:29:06 UTC