[Bug 6015] [schema11] valid (and its derivations) vs assessment as used in text

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6015


C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
           Keywords|needsReview                 |resolved
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




--- Comment #6 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>  2009-10-30 20:59:52 ---
The wording proposal mentioned in comment 5 was adopted, with amendments, by
the XML Schema WG in its call today.  The amendments had the form of (a)
adopting version B of the definitions of document validity, (b) moving them out
of section 2.1 into a new section 2.4 on Schema-validity and documents, and
making a few smaller changes.  The resulting form of the proposal (after
amendment) can be seen (intermingled with the change for bug 7913, which is
unrelated but which was also approved today) at 

  http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.nsq.html
  (member-only link; content subject to change, though none expected soon)

With this change the WG believes this issue has been resolved.

John, as the originator of the issue, please accept our thanks for holding our
feet to the fire to make us clean this up.  Then please communicate the
disposition to the SML WG, consider whether you and they are satisified with
the WG's consideration and disposition of your comment, and indicate
satisfaction by closing the issue or dissatisfaction by reopening it, in the
usual way.  If we don't hear from you in the next two weeks we will assume that
both you and the SML WG are satisfied.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Friday, 30 October 2009 20:59:54 UTC