- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:58:38 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5164
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Keywords|needsReview |resolved
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #11 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> 2009-10-30 20:58:37 ---
The wording proposal mentioned in comment 10 was adopted, with amendments, by
the XML Schema WG in its call today. The amendments had the form of (a)
adopting version B of the definitions of document validity, (b) moving them out
of section 2.1 into a new section 2.4 on Schema-validity and documents, and
making a few smaller changes. The resulting form of the proposal (after
amendment) can be seen (intermingled with the change for bug 7913, which is
unrelated but which was also approved today) at
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.nsq.html
(member-only link; content subject to change, though none expected soon)
With this change the WG believes this issue has been resolved.
John, as the originator of the issue, please accept our thanks for holding our
feet to the fire to make us clean this up. Then please consider whether you
are satisified with the WG's consideration and disposition of your comment, and
indicate satisfaction by closing the issue or dissatisfaction by reopening it,
in the usual way. If we don't hear from you in the next two weeks we will
assume that you are satisfied.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 30 October 2009 20:58:47 UTC