[Bug 6009] [schema11] unclear passages

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6009


C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
           Keywords|decided                     |resolved
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




--- Comment #7 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>  2009-04-18 14:15:03 ---
The changes agreed on the XML Schema WG telcon yesterday have now
been integrated into the status quo document at 

  http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.html

The wording proposal mentioned in comment 3 was amended and the
proposal was adopted as amended.  The minutes of the call will contain
detailed accounts of the amendments adopted; a quick summary is:
neither of the tentative changes marked not-status-quo in the proposal
(in section 1.5 and in Element Locally Valid (Element)) were adopted;
the error codes in Appendix C were not declared to be in a namespace
(some WG members had backward compatibility concerns, others were
not agreed on which namespace they should be placed into); the 
amendments proposed in comment 4 were adopted (more or less),
to wit:

    -- In 3.3.5.3 for "that not satisfied" read "that are not 
       satisfied"
    -- In 3.3.5.4 for "lighterweight" read "lighter-weight"
    -- In 3.3.5.2 remove the two Notes in which the change
       proposal marks changes (with new text "In 
       principle ...")
    -- In 3.4.4.1 s/legitimate; The/legitimate. The/
    -- In 4.2.5.1 example, make the comment read

         <!--* The XHTML 'p' element below requires us to define
               a prefix for the XHTML namespace, but it does NOT
               require us to import the XHTML namespace into the
               schema.  The use of XHTML (or other) markup here 
               is allowed by the lax wildcard in the 
               schema for schema documents.  *-->

The XML Schema WG  believes that with this issue has now been 
resolved, and I'm marking it accordingly.

John, please let us know if you and SML agree with this resolution of 
your issue, by adding a comment to the issue record and changing 
the Status of the issue to Closed. Or, if you do not agree with this
resolution, please add a comment explaining why. If you wish to
appeal the WG's decision to the Director, then also change the
Status of the record to Reopened. If you wish to record your
dissent, but do not wish to appeal the decision to the Director,
then change the Status of the record to Closed. If we do not hear
from you in the next ten days or so, we will assume you agree
with the WG decision.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Saturday, 18 April 2009 14:15:12 UTC