- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:49:10 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5023
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Keywords|decided |resolved
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #18 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> 2009-04-18 13:49:10 ---
As describd in comment 17, the XML Schema WG discussed this issue
at their regular telcon yesterday and adopted the wording proposal
mentioned in comment 5, amended by (a) the second correction given
in comment 6 and (b) the change proposed in comment 8. (The
latter makes the first change of comment 6 inapplicable; the third
point in comment 6 we thought best saved for blog posts and conference
papers.)
With this change, now integrated into the status-quo documents at
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.html
(member-only link)
the XML Schema WG believes it has resolved this issue. Accordingly I
am marking this bug RESOLVED / FIXED.
Erik Wilde, as the originator of the issue, please let us know
if you agree with this resolution of your issue, by
adding a comment to the issue record and changing the
Status of the issue to Closed. Or, if you do not agree with this
resolution, please add a comment explaining why. If you wish to
appeal the WG's decision to the Director, then also change the
Status of the record to Reopened. If you wish to record your
dissent, but do not wish to appeal the decision to the Director,
then change the Status of the record to Closed. If we do not hear
from you in the next ten days or so, we will assume you agree
with the WG decision.
`
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 18 April 2009 13:49:18 UTC