W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > October to December 2008

[Bug 5948] Reference to Unicode Database

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:37:43 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1LEmql-0003Sq-Ph@farnsworth.w3.org>


C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@w3.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
           Keywords|needsReview                 |needsDrafting

--- Comment #10 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@w3.org>  2008-12-22 15:37:43 ---
The wording proposal mentioned in comment #8 was approved by the XML Schema
WG at its telcon of 19 December 2008, with minor amendments.  We discussed the
point raised in comment #9; some WG members took comment #7 to mean that
the two files in question are in fact relevant to (changes in) block
assignment, or will be.  In the end, recalling that those two files are
already mentioned in the first note in the change proposal, not very far
above this location in the text, the WG decided just to delete that 

The changes have been integrated into the status quo document at the usual

The WG decided not to close the issue, however.  Since XSD 1.0 refers to
version 3.1 of the Unicode database, the current draft of XSD 1.1 to 4.1,
and the Unicode Consortium's web site now carries version 5.1, we discussed
briefly which version to require of XSD 1.1 processors:  3.1 (for compatibility
with XSD 1.0)?, 4.1 (for compatibility with earlier drafts of 1.1)?, or 
5.1 (to be current)?  We decided to require 5.1, and instructed the editors
to check the block and property information and update the reference.

I'm marking this needsDrafting, accordingly.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 22 December 2008 15:37:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:09:12 UTC