- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:57:01 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6234 Summary: Set or Sequence Product: XML Schema Version: 1.1 only Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Structures: XSD Part 1 AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org There are schema component properties whose values are "a set of ... components". Given that we need to provide SCDs for these components, do we need to replace "set" with "sequence"? In particular, {identity-constraint definitions} and {substitution group affiliations} on Element Declarations; {attribute uses} on Complex Type Definitions and Attribute Group Definitions; and {facets} on Simple Type Definitions. I believe this was the reason why we use "sequence" instead of "set" in some other places (e.g. "a sequence of annotations"). -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2008 15:57:12 UTC