- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:57:01 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6234
Summary: Set or Sequence
Product: XML Schema
Version: 1.1 only
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Structures: XSD Part 1
AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com
QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
There are schema component properties whose values are "a set of ...
components". Given that we need to provide SCDs for these components, do we
need to replace "set" with "sequence"?
In particular, {identity-constraint definitions} and {substitution group
affiliations} on Element Declarations; {attribute uses} on Complex Type
Definitions and Attribute Group Definitions; and {facets} on Simple Type
Definitions.
I believe this was the reason why we use "sequence" instead of "set" in some
other places (e.g. "a sequence of annotations").
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2008 15:57:12 UTC