- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:14:47 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6204
Summary: anyType/ur-Type: inconsistent whether it has a base-type
Product: XML Schema
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Structures: XSD Part 1
AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
ReportedBy: frans.englich@telia.com
QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Section 2.2.1.1 Type Definition Hierarchy reads:
"[Definition:] Except for ·xs:anyType·, every ·type definition· is, by
construction, either a ·restriction· or an ·extension· of some other type
definition. The graph of these relationships forms a tree known as the Type
Definition Hierarchy."
which implies that xs:anyType doesn't have a base type, since it makes
xs:anyType a exception, and states that the type graph is a tree, and as far as
I know circular trees does not exist(at least no one grows over here in
Scandinavia).
However, section 3.4.7 Built-in Complex Type Definition specifies the {base
type definition} for xs:anyType to be "itself", which implies circularity.
To me it seems that section 3.4.7 is wrong and its {base type definition}
should be "none".
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 3 November 2008 15:15:01 UTC