- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:14:47 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6204 Summary: anyType/ur-Type: inconsistent whether it has a base-type Product: XML Schema Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Structures: XSD Part 1 AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org ReportedBy: frans.englich@telia.com QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org Section 2.2.1.1 Type Definition Hierarchy reads: "[Definition:] Except for ·xs:anyType·, every ·type definition· is, by construction, either a ·restriction· or an ·extension· of some other type definition. The graph of these relationships forms a tree known as the Type Definition Hierarchy." which implies that xs:anyType doesn't have a base type, since it makes xs:anyType a exception, and states that the type graph is a tree, and as far as I know circular trees does not exist(at least no one grows over here in Scandinavia). However, section 3.4.7 Built-in Complex Type Definition specifies the {base type definition} for xs:anyType to be "itself", which implies circularity. To me it seems that section 3.4.7 is wrong and its {base type definition} should be "none". -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 3 November 2008 15:15:01 UTC