- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2008 00:11:37 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5940
--- Comment #5 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2008-11-01 00:11:36 ---
Re: Points (2) and (3) in comment #4
I had missed that an element declaration with no {type table} is treated
differently from an element declaration whose {type table} allows only one
alternative. My implementation will have to change, it treats both cases the
same. Logically, I think they *should* be the same, but so be it...
In point (3). "if any element named X matches the wildcard in the
content model, the parent element won't be locally valid (this is what
the WG internally sometimes refers to as the 'dynamic EDC' check)." - I haven't
come across the term "dynamic EDC", can you point me to the actual rule in the
spec?
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 1 November 2008 00:11:49 UTC