- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:08:25 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6015
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@w3.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|needsAgreement |editorial
--- Comment #2 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@w3.org> 2008-10-30 17:08:24 ---
The XML Schema WG discussed this issue at today's ftf. We note that this
issue overlaps with bug 5164, and concluded after discussion that like that
one this issue should be marked editorial.
The editors are instructed to do what they can to clarify and regularize
our usage here, and in particular to attempt to distinguish consistently
between local validity and 'deep' validity. (In particular, they should
remove the current text's claim that the unqualified term 'validity'
refers to local validity, which is not true of current usage.)
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 30 October 2008 17:08:33 UTC