- From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:28:10 +0530
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Hello WG members, I need to know the details of the fix in this reply. I looked at the member only link (cited below), and all other material about this issue, but unfortunately I have not got enough clarity about this fix. Could you please let me know in more simpler terms, What was the original problem, and how does this fix address that issue? What are the XSD 1.1 grammar details after this fix? I would also appreciate any sample XSD 1.1 Schema fragments about assertions, affected by this issue. On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:35 PM, <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org> wrote: > > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5906 > > > Sandy Gao <sandygao@ca.ibm.com> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED > Keywords|needsAgreement, |resolved > |needsDrafting | > Resolution| |FIXED > > > > > --- Comment #2 from Sandy Gao <sandygao@ca.ibm.com> 2008-10-10 17:05:38 --- > On 2008-10-10, the working group adopted a proposal to address this issue by > changing the facet element name from "assert" to "assertion". (This is mostly a > datatypes change.) > > The proposal adopted can be found here (member-only): > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-2/datatypes.b5906.html > > There were a couple amendments to the above proposal: > - An additional <assert> is replaced with <assertion> > - Added "assert" to the Schema and DTD for schemas where it was missing > > > -- > Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are the QA contact for the bug. > > -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2008 13:58:51 UTC