- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:20:39 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6044 --- Comment #7 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2008-10-10 15:20:38 --- I think there's another very pragmatic rationale as well. If two identical dateTimes without timezones weren't equal, then the same would logically have to be true for dates. And then you wouldn't be able to have a simple xs:date attribute with an enumeration such as 2008-01-31 2008-02-29 2008-03-31 2008-04-30 etc which would not only introduce a backwards incompatibility, it would also remove a useful facility with no justification outside the realms of abstract metaphysics. Michael Kay (personal response) -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 10 October 2008 15:20:52 UTC