- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 02:13:36 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6048 Summary: Clarify which times the implementation limits apply to Product: XML Schema Version: 1.1 only Platform: Macintosh URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema- comments/2008JulSep/0135.html OS/Version: Mac System 9.x Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2 AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org ReportedBy: cmsmcq@w3.org QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org In email to the XML Schema comments list on 5 September 2008 (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2008JulSep/0135.html), Peter F. Patel-Schneider raised the following issue (among others): 2/ Partial implementation limits for infinite datatypes ... 2.2/ Difficult to discern relationship to datatypes The section of the draft related to partial implementation of infinite datatypes [1] does not mention dateTime. Only a careful examination of the entire LC draft shows that year and second in this section probably refer to the year and second that appear as parts of dateTime (and other datatypes). The WG suggests as an editorial change that the relationship between year and second and the actual datatypes be made more clear in this section of the LC draft. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 9 September 2008 02:14:09 UTC