- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 02:13:36 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6048
Summary: Clarify which times the implementation limits apply to
Product: XML Schema
Version: 1.1 only
Platform: Macintosh
URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-
comments/2008JulSep/0135.html
OS/Version: Mac System 9.x
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2
AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
ReportedBy: cmsmcq@w3.org
QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
In email to the XML Schema comments list on 5 September 2008
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2008JulSep/0135.html),
Peter F. Patel-Schneider raised the following issue (among others):
2/ Partial implementation limits for infinite datatypes
...
2.2/ Difficult to discern relationship to datatypes
The section of the draft related to partial implementation of
infinite datatypes [1] does not mention dateTime. Only a careful
examination of the entire LC draft shows that year and second in
this section probably refer to the year and second that appear as
parts of dateTime (and other datatypes).
The WG suggests as an editorial change that the relationship between
year and second and the actual datatypes be made more clear in this
section of the LC draft.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 9 September 2008 02:14:09 UTC