- From: <bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 17:15:18 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5435 ------- Comment #3 from cmsmcq@w3.org 2008-05-28 17:15 ------- (Answering comment #2) The sentence in question, which appears in the opening comment of the DTD for schema documents, currently reads: With the exception of cases with multiple namespace prefixes for the XSD namespace, any XML document which is not valid per this DTD given redefinitions in its internal subset of the 'p' and 's' parameter entities below appropriate to its namespace declaration of the XSD namespace is almost certainly not a valid schema. The point being made here is that any proper parameterization of the DTD will "almost certainly" recognize a subset of the documents valid against the schema for schema documents. The additional XML representation constraints are not relevant here, and the use of the phrase "conforming schema document" instead of "valid schema document" would obscure the point. The comment echoes a remark in the introductory paragraph of the section, which uses the phrase "valid schema document". I hope this clarifies why the term "valid schema document" is proposed instead of "conforming schema document".
Received on Wednesday, 28 May 2008 17:15:52 UTC