- From: <bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 15:46:10 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5435 ------- Comment #2 from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com 2008-05-28 15:46 ------- Michael Sperberg-McQueen writes: > The exception is the occurrence of "valid schema" > in the comment at the beginning of the schema for > schema documents in > K DTD for Schemas (non-normative) > Here, "valid schema document" appears to be meant; > I suggest we change "valid schema" to "valid > schema document". Just curious: why "valid schema document" as opposed to "conforming schema document". As best I can tell, the term "Valid Schema Document" occurs in only one other place in the Rec, which is in a note and thus non-normative. To my eye/ear, "valid" has a hint of being valid per the S4S (to the extent one can actually validate against that), but seems a bit ambiguous on meeting other constraints. No big deal, but I was curious about it. Thank you. Noah
Received on Wednesday, 28 May 2008 15:46:44 UTC