- From: Dave Peterson <davep@iit.edu>
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 06:06:08 -0400
- To: Simon.Cox@csiro.au, www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
At 10:51 AM +0800 2008-05-23, Simon.Cox@csiro.au wrote: >I don't think we are talking about the same thing, unless I've missed >something. > >I want the spec that describes how schema components are identified. The >2005 draft http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-ref/ describes an XPointer >scheme xscd() > >The link you provide is for the definitions of the built-in types in the >XML Schema language. > >Am I being dense? No. I missed. My apologies. Must have been too late at night when I replied. SCDs, I believe, got back-burnered while the WG is working hard to get the LCWDs for both Datatypes and Structures, without which the WG might fold. AFAIK, SCDs is still alive, but in stasis. I specialize in the Datatypes spec, so I can't be taken as authorative for SCDs. My apologies. -- Dave Peterson SGMLWorks! davep@iit.edu
Received on Friday, 23 May 2008 10:06:53 UTC