- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 20:02:07 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3076
cmsmcq@w3.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fsasaki@w3.org
Keywords|unclassified |needsDrafting
------- Comment #2 from cmsmcq@w3.org 2007-12-14 20:02 -------
The XML Schema discussed this issue during our call today (14 December 2007).
We agreed to instruct the editors to prepare a wording proposal defining
terms intended to make it convenient to describe systems (implementations,
usage profiles, other specs, ...) which support / require that the
XML-dependent
datatypes be those of XML 1.0, such as require that they be the types of
XML 1.1, and so on.
An explicit wording proposal will be reproduced here in due course. In the
meantime, I'm marking the issue needsDrafting and adding Felix Sasaki to
the CC list (to ensure that the i18n WG is kept informed).
Received on Friday, 14 December 2007 20:02:13 UTC