- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 20:02:07 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3076 cmsmcq@w3.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fsasaki@w3.org Keywords|unclassified |needsDrafting ------- Comment #2 from cmsmcq@w3.org 2007-12-14 20:02 ------- The XML Schema discussed this issue during our call today (14 December 2007). We agreed to instruct the editors to prepare a wording proposal defining terms intended to make it convenient to describe systems (implementations, usage profiles, other specs, ...) which support / require that the XML-dependent datatypes be those of XML 1.0, such as require that they be the types of XML 1.1, and so on. An explicit wording proposal will be reproduced here in due course. In the meantime, I'm marking the issue needsDrafting and adding Felix Sasaki to the CC list (to ensure that the i18n WG is kept informed).
Received on Friday, 14 December 2007 20:02:13 UTC