- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 19:51:08 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4850 cmsmcq@w3.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Keywords|unclassified |decided, needsDrafting ------- Comment #1 from cmsmcq@w3.org 2007-12-14 19:51 ------- The XML Schema Working Group discussed this issue at its teleconference of 14 December 2007. The current reference to RFC 3066 is non-normative: the xsd:language datatype is intended to hold language codes as defined by RFC 3066 or its successor(s), but type validity is defined solely by a simple regular expression, and a note points out that for the full checking of language codes, additional work is required beyond checking for type validity. We did not choose to change that basic pattern; implicitly, the WG agreed with the proposal implicit in the description, to leave the grammar of the xsd:language type alone. We did agree to refer to BCP 47 instead of RFC 3066 as appropriate; the editors were so instructed, and I thank you for the details you provide about what we should be referring to. In view of the purpose of BCP 47 and other documents in the BCP series, it may seem unnecessary to retain the words "or its successor(s)", but I expect we'll keep them just in case. (But we'll delete the reference to the standards track.) Felix, as originator of the issue, please indicate your acceptance of this disposition by changing the status of the bug to RESOLVED. Or, if for some reason you are dissatisfied, please let us know why and how we can satisfy your concerns. If the WG doesn't hear from you in a month, we'll assume you're happy.
Received on Friday, 14 December 2007 19:51:14 UTC