- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 13:16:04 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5167 Summary: misc editorial Product: XML Schema Version: 1.1 only Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Structures: XSD Part 1 AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org ReportedBy: johnarwe@us.ibm.com QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org 3.17.2.2 References to Schema Components from Elsewhere refer to xpointer scheme, which has been abandoned. technically legal perhaps since the ref is not normative, but probably easy to re-cast example to one of the "blessed" xptr schemes G.1 Changes made since version 1.0, Complex type definitions (miscellaneous changes) from: "are now forbidded to have different values" to: "are now forbidden to have different values" G.1 Changes made since version 1.0, Changes to element declarations: "Introduction of a special ·xsd:error· for use in" missing word after xsd:error - is it an error code, property, component, ...? G.1 Changes made since version 1.0, The process of validation: "lax assessment was optional and did not require the validation of [children] or [attributes]." should it be assessment of children or validation of attributes? G.2 Issues not resolved from: "it may be useful to mention Some points on which possible changes " to: "It may be useful to mention some points where possible changes " G.2 Issues not resolved "edge cases remain which different conformant implementations will treat differently." list those known, or point to a list G.2 Issues not resolved "new system of error codes was originally foreseen for XSDL 1.1, but has not been completed for inclusion here." clarify if still intended or has been dumped in the Thames permanently J Glossary (non-normative) "valid the word valid and its derivatives are used to refer to clause 1 above, the determination of local schema-validity" - There is no clause 1 above in this context. - looked for various combinations of local schema-validity, none in glossary
Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2007 13:16:13 UTC