- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 00:07:49 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5165 Summary: Editorial: numbering of rules and constraints Product: XML Schema Version: 1.1 only Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Structures: XSD Part 1 AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org ReportedBy: mike@saxonica.com QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org Bug #5152 reminds me to make a comment that has been at the back of my mind for a long time: it would be very much easier on the reader if validation rules, constraints, information set contributions and similar pseudo-sections became regular sections numbered according to the place in the document structure where they occur. This would make it easier to refer to them when discussing the spec (for example, when raising comments on a draft), and when reading the spec, especially by following links, it would reduce the sense of disorientation felt when you have no idea where in the document you have landed. It would ensure that the rules appear in the table of contents, and for those who like to use printed copies of the spec on paper, it would make the links much easier to follow.
Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2007 00:07:56 UTC