- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:04:47 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3244 ------- Comment #4 from mike@saxonica.com 2007-09-27 08:04 ------- Looking good. But one minor quibble (or rather, two). In the set of all finite-length lists formed from the members of the ˇprimitiveˇ datatypes. (a) is "formed from" clear? (b) is "members" clear? (and in particular, is there any danger that anyone could misread this as suggesting the items in a list must all belong to the same primitive type?) (I'll avoid reopening the discussion on "finite-length" as I'm in danger of shooting myself in the foot...) Would the following be better: the set of all finite-length lists of ˇatomic valuesˇ and then taking care to define atomic value (we almost do so already, but not quite).
Received on Thursday, 27 September 2007 08:04:54 UTC