- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 07:49:39 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3242 ------- Comment #2 from mike@saxonica.com 2007-09-27 07:49 ------- Looks good. >(Life would perhaps be simpler if unqualified names were in a sort of special anonymous default namespace, but they are not. Complaints to the editors of the Namespaces Rec, please.) I did complain to them and it did no good. Perhaps that's because I complained about nearly everything in their spec. But we could make life simpler for ourselves. Just define that "in this specification", namespace means either (a) a namespace as defined in the namespaces Rec, or (b) the set of names which, in the terminology of the namespaces Rec, are not in any namespace; this specification refers to this set of names as "the unnamed namespace".
Received on Thursday, 27 September 2007 07:49:52 UTC