- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:20:00 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2822 ------- Comment #3 from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com 2007-08-21 14:19 ------- > Noah, please confirm that you are happy with the > WG's resolution of this issue by changing the > status of the issue from Resolved to Closed, > optionally with a comment. If you are not happy, > please change the status from Resolved to > Reopened, and use the comment field to explain > why. If we don't hear from you one way or the > other within two weeks, we will assume you are > happy with the resolution. > [...] > Eighteen months have passed without response from > the originator of this issue. I think it's time > to close it. I'm very sorry. As you might have guessed, I managed to miss the fact that we were formally waiting on a response from me. For the record: yes, I find that our resolution is satisfactory for Schema 1.1. Maybe or maybe not experience with Schema 1.1 will suggest additional things we should do later, but I concur that we are doing the correct thing in closing this issue at this time. Thank you, and please accept my apologies for being so tardy. Noah Eighteen months have passed without response from the originator of this issue. I think it's time to close it.
Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2007 14:20:16 UTC