[Bug 3078] Explain apparent contradiction re: order of durations

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3078





------- Comment #4 from davep@iit.edu  2006-09-30 15:08 -------
(In reply to comment #3)

>    Note:  The ordered facet is partial even though the datatype is
>    in fact totally ordered, because (as explained in 4.2.1 ordered),
>    the value of that facet is unchanged by derivation.

Oops!, my error; the Notes actually read:

    Note:  The ordered facet has the value partial even though the
    datatype is in fact totally ordered, because (as explained in
    4.2.1 ordered), the value of that facet is unchanged by derivation.

(The difference is in the first line; s/is/has the value/.)

Received on Saturday, 30 September 2006 15:08:48 UTC