[Bug 3078] Explain apparent contradiction re: order of durations

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3078


davep@iit.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
           Keywords|needsDrafting               |resolved
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




------- Comment #3 from davep@iit.edu  2006-09-30 15:03 -------
A note reading

   Note:  The ordered facet is partial even though the datatype is
   in fact totally ordered, because (as explained in 4.2.1 ordered),
   the value of that facet is unchanged by derivation.

has been placed in the status quo document at the end of the fundamental facets
list in the facets section of each of yearMonthDuration and dayTimeDuration.

Please let us know if you agree with this resolution of your issue, 
by adding a comment to the issue record and changing the Status of 
the issue to Closed.  Or, if you do not agree with this resolution, 
please add a comment explaining why. If you wish to appeal the WG's 
decision to the Director, then also change the Status of the record 
to Reopened. If you wish to record your dissent, but do not wish to 
appeal the decision to the Director, then change the Status of the 
record to Closed.  If we do not hear from you in the next two weeks, 
we will assume you agree with the WG decision.

Received on Saturday, 30 September 2006 15:03:08 UTC