- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 02:03:00 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2867
Summary: RQ-9 Expand wildcard namespace constraints (wildcard-ns-
sets)
Product: XML Schema
Version: 1.1 only
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: needsAgreement
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Structures: XSD Part 1
AssignedTo: ht@w3.org
ReportedBy: cmsmcq@w3.org
QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
This issue was originally reported by James Clark.
The namespace constraints on wildcards must be more expressive in
order to be able to express the union or intersection of any two
wildcards. Specifically, it must be possible to express "any namespace
except those in the following list."
See
http://www.w3.org/2000/12/xmlschema-crcomments.html#wildcard-minus:
CR-20.
See also
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2002AprJun/0164.html
Input from:
James Clark:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2000OctDec/0216
Judith A. Slein:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2001JanMar/0050
Matthew Fuchs:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2001JanMar/0052
Judith A. Slein:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2001JanMar/0053
Matthew Fuchs:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2001JanMar/0054
Judith A. Slein:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2001JanMar/0057
Straw Poll O-12
This item was discussed in the meeting of 2003-11-04
(http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2003/11/xml-schema-ftf-minutes.html)
This item was postponed in the meeting of 2004-05-13
(http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/05/xml-schema-ftf-minutes.html). It
may be taken up again in the context of the discussion of how best to
support versioning.
Proposal:
Microsoft proposals, item 1.3 (member-only link)
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Oct/0149.html)
Asir Vedamuthu(member-only link)
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Oct/0163.html)
According to the requirements document, we eventually postponed this
topic for later reconsideration.
Received on Saturday, 11 February 2006 02:03:11 UTC