- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:42:29 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2243 Summary: R-251: 2E PER: Probable editorial problem, mix/maxExclusive facets Product: XML Schema Version: 1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XSD Part 2: Datatypes AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org The attempt to make redundant derivations using repeated Exclusive facets with the same value works only part way. According to the definitions, One can derive a from decimal setting using maxExclusive = 29, redundantly derive b from a using maxExclusive = 29, but are then not permitted to derive c from b again using maxExclusive = 29. (Weird, but that's the way it is.) This one-level redundancy is explicitly permitted by the definitions of minExclusive and maxExclusive, but didn't make its way into the descriptions of the schema components, nor of the XML representation summaries. So they contradict the definition. I suspect this is an editorial error in 2E PER. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2004JanMar/0085.html
Received on Wednesday, 14 September 2005 19:42:34 UTC