- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:42:29 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2243
Summary: R-251: 2E PER: Probable editorial problem,
mix/maxExclusive facets
Product: XML Schema
Version: 1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XSD Part 2: Datatypes
AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com
QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
The attempt to make redundant derivations using repeated Exclusive facets with
the same value works only part way. According to the definitions, One can
derive a from decimal setting using maxExclusive = 29, redundantly derive b
from a using maxExclusive = 29, but are then not permitted to derive c from b
again using maxExclusive = 29. (Weird, but that's the way it is.)
This one-level redundancy is explicitly permitted by the definitions of
minExclusive and maxExclusive, but didn't make its way into the descriptions of
the schema components, nor of the XML representation summaries. So they
contradict the definition. I suspect this is an editorial error in 2E PER.
See
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2004JanMar/0085.html
Received on Wednesday, 14 September 2005 19:42:34 UTC