- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 18:46:16 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2183
Summary: R-190: Truncation is not defined
Product: XML Schema
Version: 1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XSD Part 2: Datatypes
AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com
QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Part 2: Datatypes frequently defines the lexical representation of one type as
a "truncation" of that of another, without ever defining what is meant by this
term. Sometimes it seems to have the conventional meaning of omitting
characters from one end of a string, as in:
The lexical representation for gYear is the reduced (right truncated) lexical
representation for dateTime: CCYY. [section 3.2.11.1]
Other times the omitted characters are replaced by other characters, as in:
The lexical representation for gDay is the left truncated lexical
representation for date: ---DD . [section 3.2.13.1]
It's not difficult to understand what is meant, but the document overall
aspires to (and for the most part handily achieves) a higher standard of
precision. For consistency, I'd like to see the term defined in 1.1.
See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2002OctDec/0128.html
Received on Wednesday, 14 September 2005 18:46:23 UTC