- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 09:44:42 +0100
- To: "Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@nortel.com>
- Cc: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
"Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@nortel.com> writes:
> SQC exhibits the same problem, and incidentally another problem with
> finalDefault.
That's disappointing. . .
> An in a similar vein, if the following statement is applied:
> Note: Although the ·validation· semantics of a choice group does
> not depend on the order of its particles, derived choice groups
> are required to match the order of their base in order to simplify
> checking that the derivation is OK.
> How does the validating parser know the "order" of the elements in a
> substitution group?
Yes, that's a long-standing glitch in the REC, which will be fixed in
1.1 we hope. Perhaps that's why SQC is complaining . . .
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Thursday, 21 April 2005 08:47:17 UTC