- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 09:44:42 +0100
- To: "Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@nortel.com>
- Cc: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
"Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@nortel.com> writes: > SQC exhibits the same problem, and incidentally another problem with > finalDefault. That's disappointing. . . > An in a similar vein, if the following statement is applied: > Note: Although the ·validation· semantics of a choice group does > not depend on the order of its particles, derived choice groups > are required to match the order of their base in order to simplify > checking that the derivation is OK. > How does the validating parser know the "order" of the elements in a > substitution group? Yes, that's a long-standing glitch in the REC, which will be fixed in 1.1 we hope. Perhaps that's why SQC is complaining . . . ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Thursday, 21 April 2005 08:47:17 UTC