W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > January to March 2004

RE: two more typos in Part 2 of PER

From: Biron,Paul V <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 13:33:51 -0800
Message-Id: <8E9F0028F5955844899380433C60E399013E3A01@cscrdemsg001.crdc.kp.org>
To: "'Anli Shundi'" <ashundi@tibco.com>, "'www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org'" <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anli Shundi [mailto:ashundi@tibco.com] 
> Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 6:09 AM
> To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
> Subject: two more typos in Part 2 of PER
> Parenthesis vs brace at S{,m)
> Note:  The regular expression language in the Perl 
> Programming Language [Perl] does not include a quantifier
> of the form S{,m), since it is logically equivalent to S{0,m}

Thanx Anli.  While the scope of the review of 2e PER is supposed to be limited to the errata and this is an additional typo that we never saw before, I think we're safe in correcting it as well before 2e becomes a Rec...right?

> Unclosed parenthesis started at:
> The lexical space of base64Binary is given by the following 
> grammar (the notation is that used in [XML 1.0 ...

Yup...we'll correct that one as well.

Received on Monday, 22 March 2004 17:22:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:09:02 UTC