Re: Canonical lexical representation of duration, redux from Ashok Malhotra on 2003-11-29 (www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org from October to December 2003)

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 06:21:11 -0800
To: <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>, <staschuk@telusplanet.net>
Message-ID: <EDB607C8AC991F40BE646533A1A673E8B6FDFB@RED-MSG-42.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

Steven:
This is in response to your comment
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2002OctDec/0
131.html
I am sorry that it has taken us so long to respond to you.  On the
11/21/2003 telcon the XML Schema decided to classify the 
situation identified in your comment as "error with erratum".  We will
add wording to correct it.  I trust this is satisfactory.

All the best, Ashok

Received on Saturday, 29 November 2003 09:21:16 UTC