- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 18:04:41 -0500
- To: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@mclink.it>
- Cc: "[XML Schema Comments]" <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>, "[Public XML Schema-DEV]" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
> Please note that my previous email intended to raise > the issue in relation to PSVI contributions. Whenever > a value V of a datatype D *can* be represented in > (non-canonical) lexical representation but *cannot* be > represented in canonical lexical representation, > certain contributions to the PSVI (say, the one for > default attributes) will be either impossible or wrong. Right. I seem to recall that there are some plans to change the mechanics of default value handling to avoid dependencies on canonical forms in future releases, but I can't offhand find the reference for any such proposals. -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 --------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 20 November 2003 18:05:30 UTC