- From: Biron,Paul V <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 15:26:46 -0800
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Message-Id: <8904C60CACA7D51191BC00805FEAAF4301B8BCB1@crdc-exch-7.crdc.kp.org>
For some reason, the message below, which I sent last week never showed up in the archives...so I'm sending it again.
pvb
-----Original Message-----
From: Biron,Paul V
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
forwarding this request so it gets in our queue...
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Rys [mailto:mrys@microsoft.com]
Sent: Fri, Oct 31, 2003 21:47
To: Michael Rys; w3c-xml-query-wg@w3.org
OTOH http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#xsi.nil says
Attribute Declaration for the 'nil' attribute
Property
Value
{name} <http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#a-name#a-name>
nil
{target namespace} <http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#a-target_namespace#a-target_namespace>
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance
{type definition} <http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#type_definition#type_definition>
The built-in boolean <http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-2-20010502/datatypes#boolean> simple type definition
{scope} <http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#a-scope#a-scope>
global
{value constraint} <http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#a-value_constraint#a-value_constraint>
*absent* <http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#key-null#key-null>
{annotation} <http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#a-annotation#a-annotation>
*absent* <http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#key-null#key-null>
So what should be considered normative?
Best regards
Michael
________________________________
From: Michael Rys
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 9:44 PM
To: w3c-xml-query-wg@w3.org
Subject: Built-in Attributes
The xsi schema at http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance defines the built-in attributes:
<xs:attribute name="nil" />
<xs:attribute name="type" />
<xs:attribute name="schemaLocation" />
<xs:attribute name="noNamespaceSchemaLocation" />
This implies that their types are xs:anySimpleType. However the F.S. gives more specific types. Shouldn't we align with the xsi schema?
Best regards
Michael
Received on Monday, 10 November 2003 18:31:20 UTC