- From: Biron,Paul V <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 15:26:46 -0800
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Message-Id: <8904C60CACA7D51191BC00805FEAAF4301B8BCB1@crdc-exch-7.crdc.kp.org>
For some reason, the message below, which I sent last week never showed up in the archives...so I'm sending it again. pvb -----Original Message----- From: Biron,Paul V To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org forwarding this request so it gets in our queue... -----Original Message----- From: Michael Rys [mailto:mrys@microsoft.com] Sent: Fri, Oct 31, 2003 21:47 To: Michael Rys; w3c-xml-query-wg@w3.org OTOH http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#xsi.nil says Attribute Declaration for the 'nil' attribute Property Value {name} <http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#a-name#a-name> nil {target namespace} <http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#a-target_namespace#a-target_namespace> http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance {type definition} <http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#type_definition#type_definition> The built-in boolean <http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-2-20010502/datatypes#boolean> simple type definition {scope} <http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#a-scope#a-scope> global {value constraint} <http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#a-value_constraint#a-value_constraint> *absent* <http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#key-null#key-null> {annotation} <http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#a-annotation#a-annotation> *absent* <http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#key-null#key-null> So what should be considered normative? Best regards Michael ________________________________ From: Michael Rys Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 9:44 PM To: w3c-xml-query-wg@w3.org Subject: Built-in Attributes The xsi schema at http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance defines the built-in attributes: <xs:attribute name="nil" /> <xs:attribute name="type" /> <xs:attribute name="schemaLocation" /> <xs:attribute name="noNamespaceSchemaLocation" /> This implies that their types are xs:anySimpleType. However the F.S. gives more specific types. Shouldn't we align with the xsi schema? Best regards Michael
Received on Monday, 10 November 2003 18:31:20 UTC